top of page

TOP LEGAL UPDATES OF THE DAY- 08/06/2023


High Court of Kerala held that Gratuity must be computed from the date it became payable, not from the date it was disbursed.


Recently the High Court of Kerala held that according to the Payment of Gratuity Act of 1972, the maximum amount of gratuity payable to an employee must be determined with respect to the date on which the gratuity becomes payable to them, rather than the date on which the amount must be disbursed to them.



"Temples are symbols of state's culture," says Madras High Court, ordering the state to carry out the 2021 judgement on historical monuments and temples.


Temples are a symbol of the state's cultural and historical heritage, according to the Madras High Court, which recently directed the Tamil Nadu government to comply with the Court's 2021 judgement, which issued broad directions on protecting historical monuments, sites, temples, and their properties.



The Supreme Court has reserved its decision on whether BCI can refuse to enrol graduates from a de-recognized law school.


The Supreme Court deferred its decision in a petition that asked whether the Bar Council of India (BCI) has the authority to de-regulate matters related to education prior to the enrolment as an advocate.



The Supreme Court rules that the trial court has the authority under Section 319 of the Criminal Procedure Code to charge someone who has not been named in the FIR but appears to have committed the crime.


According to Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, a court holding a trial against someone who is not named as an accused in the FIR but has committed a crime should be tried alongside the accused who is standing trial.

The Division-Judge bench of Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Pankaj Mittal further stated that the court presiding over the trial must be satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt, as created at the time a charge is framed.



Absence of Witnesses Is Not Enough To Clear Accused In POCSO Case If Survivor's Testimony Is Reliable: High Court of Meghalaya




The Meghalaya High Court has ruled that the absence of witnesses in sexual assault cases under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO Act) will not be utilised to absolve the guilty.

A Bench comprising of Chief Justice Sanjib Banerjee and Justice W Diengdoh refuted the concept of unsubstantiated claims and thorough denials by survivors of such cases.













Bình luận

Đã xếp hạng 0/5 sao.
Chưa có xếp hạng

Thêm điểm xếp hạng
Post: Blog2 Post

Subscribe Form

Thanks for submitting!

  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook

©2022 by Lawsymptoms.

bottom of page