By- Suprana Chakraborty, National Forensic Science University, Delhi Campus.
The landlord cannot refuse to take ownership of the premises from the tenant because of property damage : Delhi High Court.
The Patiala House Court in Delhi recently ruled that a landlord cannot refuse to return leased property to the tenant because the premises were damaged.
The Court further stated that by failing to obtain unequivocal possession of the property from the tenant, landlords cannot thereafter claim for rent recovery for the period following the tenant's vacation of the property.
It will be difficult to give additional reservations for transgender people; the 50% limit will be exceeded: Maharashtra informs the Bombay High Court
On Tuesday, the Maharashtra government informed the Bombay High Court that it is currently difficult to offer further (horizontal and/or vertical) reservations for transgender people in education and employment forums.
Dr. Birendra Saraf, Advocate General of Maharashtra, informed the Court that providing extra reservations for transgender people would violate the Supreme Court's 50 percent reservation limit.
The Madras High Court has ruled that government hospitals cannot discriminate in their treatment of patients.
According to the Madras High Court, the right to life includes the right to appropriate medical treatment, and there can be no discrimination in treating patients in government institutions.
The Court made the statement while declining to award compensation to a lady who claimed her son was suffering from an illness as a result of Primary Health Centre's medical negligence.
A petition has been filed in the Delhi High Court against the Adoption Regulations, which prohibit parents with two children from adopting a third "normal child."
A petition has been filed in the Delhi High Court contesting modifications to the Adoption Regulations published under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, which prohibit parents from adopting a 'normal child' if they already have two children.
According to the petition, the Steering Committee Resource Authority decided to apply the Adoption Regulations, 2022 with retroactive effect, which was arbitrary, unjustified, and in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution.
Jesi Jeevarathinam, who has two biological children, submitted the petition in order to adopt a kid in December 2020.
The Madras High Court refers the case of whether it is permissible to bury dead remains in sites that are not recognised as burial grounds to a larger bench.
In light of the terms of the Tamil Nadu Village Panchayats (Provision of Burial and Burning Grounds) Rules, 1999 (1999 Rules), the Madras High Court recently submitted the subject of whether one can bury the dead in areas other than approved burial sites to a larger bench.
A division bench of Chief Justice SV Gangapurwala and Justice PD Audikesavalu was hearing a petition filed by Jagadheeswari, who was challenging a previous order to exhume and relocate her deceased husband's remains from their current burial site on private land owned by another person to a designated burial site.
The Court noted that on April 24, this year, a single bench of the Madras High Court headed over by Justice M Dhandapani ruled that the act of burying the deceased corpse in a place not designated for that purpose could not be permitted.
コメント